- PER: deductible at entry, taxable at exit, locked until retirement
- Life insurance: no deduction, reduced taxation after 8 years, available at any time
- PER becomes advantageous from the 30 percent tax bracket
- Life insurance unbeatable for transmission (152,500 euros per beneficiary exempt)
Choosing between PER and life insurance is a common question. Both products are complementary, but their tax logics differ. Here is a factual comparison to inform your decision.
Comparison table
| Criterion | PER | Life insurance |
|---|---|---|
| Entry taxation | Deductible from taxable income | No deduction |
| Exit taxation | Taxable (capital and gains) | Reduced after 8 years |
| Availability | Locked until retirement (except cases) | Available at any time |
| Transmission | Variable taxation by age | 152,500 euros exempt per beneficiary |
| Contribution cap | 10 percent of professional income | Unlimited |
Who should prioritise the PER?
Highly taxed households (30, 41 or 45 percent marginal rate) benefit from an immediate tax reduction. A 10,000 euros contribution to the PER by a 41 percent household generates 4,100 euros of tax savings.
Who should prioritise life insurance?
- Need for flexibility: savings remain available
- Transmission goal: 152,500 euros exempt per beneficiary for contributions before 70
- Investment horizon under 10 years
- Low or no tax household (0 or 11 percent rate)
Hybrid strategies
Many portfolios combine both wrappers. The PER captures the immediate tax reduction, life insurance plays the role of flexible savings pocket. To go further, see our life insurance guide and our article on FCPR which can be housed in a PER.
Useful links
See also: IFI 2026, Livret A vs LDDS, glossary.
Photo: Pexels